Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-regression analysis for different parameters

From: Diagnostic accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Parameter

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Specificity (95% CI)

Type of research

Prospective (4 studies)

69% (48–90%)

99% (97–100%)

Retrospective (9 studies)

80% (69–90%)

98% (94–100%)

Meta-regression P-value

0.13

0.00

Sequencing conditions

BGISEQ (7 studies)

72% (57–86%)

98% (93–100%)

Others (6 studies)

82% (70–94%)

99% (97–100%)

Meta-regression P-value

0.07

0.27

Homogenization

Yes (7 studies)

67% (53–80%)

99% (95–100%)

No (6 studies)

86% (77–94%)

99% (95–100%)

Meta-regression P-value

0.00

0.07

Sample pre-treatment

With bead-beating (6 studies)

82% (77–94%)

99% (97–100%)

Without bead-beating (7 studies)

72% (57–86%)

98% (93–100%)

Meta-regression P-value

0.87

0.02