Study | Benefits |
---|---|
Sims et al. [32] Roach et al. [29] McShan et al. [7] Brown et al. [13] Arnold et al. [28] | ▪ Improving the quality of study ▪ Simplifying interview questions ▪ Providing an alternative way of data analysis ▪ Improving decision-making in the field of the study process (receiving funds, choosing scientific guides) ▪ Improving the credibility of the study ▪ Promoting the use of study results for the general public, policymakers, and other stakeholders ▪ Providing a realistic, unique, and diverse view in the process of research design and implementation ▪ Helping researchers to better understand the views and opinions of the study audience ▪ Helping to develop programs with higher health literacy ▪ Changing the knowledge and views of stakeholders, which led to their roles and scope of engagement evolving over time ▪ Achieving more relevant and meaningful studies ▪ Create space for sharing views and better mutual understanding of stakeholders and researchers ▪ Hearing the voices and opinions of people whose voices are less heard in society ▪ Democratic design of the study process and reduction of discrimination ▪ Improving the study design and associated outcomes, and ensuring cultural appropriateness of materials ▪ Increasing recruitment and retention of research subjects ▪ Injecting transparency, and accountability into the research process ▪ Reduced length of surveys administered to study participants ▪ Ensuring study goals and project activities are meaningful and patient-centered ▪ Grown research team’s understanding of the scope, value, and importance of partnering with patients in research |