Study | Eara | Principals |
---|---|---|
Sims et al. [32] Pollock et al. [31] Gesell et al. [3] Roach et al. [29] Brown et al. [13] Arnold et al. [28] Hoekstra et al. [11] | Principals related to research process | ▪ Ethical considerations ▪ Development of a suitable protocol (road map) for the stakeholders and Explanation of the role and responsibility of stakeholders ▪ Detailed and operational planning for the engagement of stakeholders ▪ Use the targeted strategy and select a diverse group of stakeholders with good experience through local and national professionals or community networks and spend proper time and consideration to recruit stakeholders ▪ Predetermined planning to manage disagreements between stakeholders and researchers ▪ Maintaining transparency and trust in communication with stakeholders ▪ Active participation of all co-researchers in all parts of the research process on an equal basis ▪ Determine level and type of stakeholder engagement according to their interest, skill, time, health status and project needs and budget constraints ▪ Develop an engagement database ▪ Engage groups that are marginalized or disadvantaged in society ▪ Choosing the appropriate time and place to hold consultation meetings for stakeholders (e.g., patients with mobility restrictions) ▪ Have informal meetings (to get to know each other) and structured meetings (face-to-face, phone, conference calls) ▪ Ensuring that IT support is available before and during meetings ▪ More frequent, shorter, meetings (rather than less frequent, longer meetings) ▪ Permanent reflection on relationships and power dynamics in the field of engagement in research processes ▪ Consideration the experience of the research team about stakeholder engagement at the planning stage ▪ Include a knowledge broker or other facilitator to support the collaborative process (e.g., facilitate conversations) ▪ Funding for the collaborative research activities |
Principals related to stakeholders | ▪ Orientation and ongoing training of stakeholders ▪ Pay the engagement costs of patients and caregivers (such as travel expenses) ▪ Attention to the needs and values of stakeholders and issues that may provoke emotional responses from stakeholders ▪ Getting feedback from the stakeholders about their engagement in the research process continuously ▪ Evaluating the level of satisfaction of the stakeholders from the engagement and the feeling of the value of their perspective ▪ Providing Regular “check-ins” and feedback opportunities for stakeholders to share their viewpoints and ask questions ▪ Careful attention to potential burnout, overcommitment ▪ The benefits of being engaged in research should be clearly defined ▪ Cooperation in the research project should depart from these familiar role patterns and allow for more liberal cooperation, for example, without entering into a therapy contract | |
Principals related to researchers | ▪ Using simple and understandable language in communication with patients and caregivers (e.g., aphasia-friendly information sheet) ▪ Listening carefully to the opinions and views of stakeholders ▪ Considering the appropriate and different communication methods for engagement of stakeholders and informing them about the research process (face-to-face interview, email, phone, etc.) ▪ Flexibility and openness in stakeholder engagement ▪ Educate and/or train researchers about stakeholder engagement ▪ Use different tools to ensure that research users understand and/or participate in everything (e.g., flipcharts, communication tools) |