Skip to main content

Table 4 Distinctive informative values of at least 10 within the current sample

From: A case study of the informative value of risk of bias and reporting quality assessments for systematic reviews

Reporting element

Percentage reported

DIV

Ethical review

64.6

35.4

Conflicts of interest

34.8

34.8

Limitations

29.3

29.3

Baseline values

26.2

26.2

Unit of analysis

26.2

26.2

Animal model relevance

74.4

25.6

Statistical methods

23.9

23.9

Number of animals (incl. humans)

81.1

18.9

Experimental groups

83.5

16.5

Methods — what was done?

15.9

15.9

Inclusion criteria

15.2

15.2

Generalisability

86.0

14.0

Housing and husbandry (animal studies)

12.8

12.8

Statistical assumption tests

12.3

12.3

Type of experimental design

12.2

12.2

Adverse events

10.4

10.4