Table 3 Checklist for sufficiently reporting co-created intervention, service, or product
Section | Checklist item | Response (yes; no; partly) |
|---|---|---|
Planning | ||
Was the sampling procedure described? (criteria, setting of recruitment) | ||
Was it clear where the co-creation of the intervention, service, or product took place? (online, onsite) | ||
Was a clear description of the co-creators provided? (demographic information, number, characteristics of interest) | ||
Was it clear who facilitated the co-creation process? | ||
Conducting | ||
Procedure components | Was there evidence of an attempt to manifest ownership? (branding of the group, identifying rights and responsibilities) | |
Was the level of participation from the co-creators described? (equal, decision power, all stages) | ||
Was the overall aim of meetings and the purpose of each meeting presented to the group? | ||
Procedure methods | Was the frequency of meetings described? Was the duration of the meetings described? | |
Were any interactive techniques and materials used in the co-creation process adequately described? | ||
Was the description of the overall co-creation process complete? | ||
Evaluation | ||
Process | Was co-creator satisfaction, experience or contribution evaluated? (retention rates) | |
Were the results reported back to the co-creators and public? | ||
Outcome | Was the outcome of the intervention, service or product described? | |
Were plans for formal testing of the effectiveness or scalability of the co-created intervention, service or product discussed? | ||
Was there an explanation of how the validity of the process and outcome were evaluated? (face validation) | ||