Skip to main content

Table 3 Primary and secondary outcomes

From: Effect of anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: GRADE- assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study

Successful ECV

Vaginal delivery

Cesarean delivery

Vaginal breech delivery

Emergency Cesarean delivery

Transient fetal bradycardia

Nonreassuring fetal testing (excluding transient bradycardia) after ECV

Maternal discomfort

Maternal pain score

Abruption placentae

Vaginal bleeding or postpartum hemorrhage

Maternal satisfaction scores

Hypotension

Schorr et al, 1997 [27]

24/35 (68.6%) vs 11/34 (32.3%)

23/35 (65.7%) vs

7/34 (20.6%)

12/35 (34.3%) vs 27/34 (79.4%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

1/35 (2.8%) vs 4/34 (11.8%)

Not reported

0/35(0%) vs 0/34(0%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Dugoff et al, 1999 [9]

22/50 (44.0%) vs 22/52 (42.3%)

16/50 (32.0%) vs 25/52 (48.1%)

34/50 (68.0%) vs 27/52 (51.9%

0/50 (0.0%) vs 0/52 (0.0%)

0/50 (0.0%) vs 1/52 (1.9%)

11/50 (22.0%) vs 6/52 (12.0%)

0/50 (0.0%) vs 1/52 (1.9%)

0/50 (0.0%) vs 4/52 (8.0%)

Not reported

0/50 (0.0%) vs 1/52 (1.9%)

Not reported

Not reported

4/50(8%) vs 0/52(0%)

Mancuso et al, 2000 [8]

32/54 (59.2%) vs 18/54(33.3%)

29/54 (53.7%) vs 17/54 (31.5%)

25/54 (46.3%) vs 37/54 (68.5%)

1/54 (1.8%) vs 3/54 (5.5%)

0/54 (0.0%) vs 0/54 (0.0%)

2/54 (3.7%) vs 3/54 (5.5%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

0/54 (0.0%) vs 0/54 (0.0%)

Not reported

Not reported

0/54(0%) vs 0/54(0%)

Weiniger et al, 2007 [28]

24/36 (66.6%) vs 11/34 (32.3%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

0/36 (0.0%) vs 0/34 (0.0%)

Not reported

2/36 (5.5%) vs 0/34 (0.0%)

Higher in control group

VAS (0=no pain, 10=severe pain) 1.76±2.7 vs 6.84±3.1

0/36 (0.0%) vs 0/34 (0.0%)

Not reported

Not reported

7/36(19.4%) vs 0/34(0%)

Weiniger et al, 2010 [29]

27/31 (87.0%) vs 19/33 (57.6%)

27/31 (87.1%) vs 30/33 (91.0%)

4/31 (12.9%) vs 3/33 (9.1%)

0/31 (0.0%) vs 3/33 (9.1%)

0/31 (0.0%) vs 0/33 (0.0%)

2/31 (6.4%) vs 1/33 (3.0%)

1/31 (3.0%) vs 0/33 (0.0%)

Higher in control group

VAS (0=no pain, 10=severe pain) 1.7±2.4 vs 5.5±2.9

0/31 (0.0%) vs 0/33 (0.0%)

Not reported

Not reported

10/31(32%) vs 0/33(0%)

Burgos et al, 2013 [11]

157/300(52.3%) vs 79/150(52.7%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

3/300(1%) vs 2/150(1.3%)

1/300(0.3%) vs 1/150(0.7%)

0/300(0.0%) vs 1/150(0.7%)

Not reported

Numeric rating scale (1–3: mild pain, 4–7: moderate pain, 8–10: severe pain) 6 [4–7] vs 7 [5–8]

Not reported

4/300(1.3%) vs 4/150(2.6%)

Not reported

Not reported

Munoz et al, 2014 [12]

17/31 (54.8%) vs 12/29 (41.3%)

14/31(45.2%) vs 11/29(37.9%)

17/31(54.8%) vs 16/29(55.2%)

Not reported

Not reported

3/31(9.7%) vs 9/29(31.0%)

Not reported

2/31(6.5%) vs 4/29(13.8%)

Numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) 4.7 ± 2.5 vs 6.5 ± 2.4

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Khaw et al, 2015 [10]

52/63 (82.5%) vs 40/63 (63.5%) vs 40/63(63.5%)

52/63(83%) vs 40/63(64%) vs 40/63(64%)

23/63(36.5%) vs 32/63(50.8%) vs 32/63(50.8%)

Not reported

3/63(4.8%) vs 6/63(9.6%) vs 3/63(4.8%)

Not reported

3/63(4.8%) vs 6/63(9.6%) vs 3/63(4.8%)

Higher in control group

VAS (0 mm=none, 100 mm=most extreme) 0[0-0]vs 35[0-60] vs 50 [30-75]

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Liu et al, 2016 [14]

43/76(56.5%) vs 30/76(39.5%)

64/76(84.2%) vs 70/76(92.1%)

12/76(15.8%) vs 6/76(7.9%)

Not reported

Not reported

4/76(5.3%) vs 7/76(9.2%)

Not reported

Not reported

NRPS (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable) 4.6±2.6 vs 6.5±2.7

Not reported

Not reported

Numerical rating scale (0=completely dissatisfied, 10=completely satisfied) 9.6 ±1.4 vs 6.4 ± 3.7

1/76(1.3%) vs 0/76(0%)

Wang et al, 2017 [30]

41/72 (56.9%) vs 28/72 (38.9%)

37/72(51.4%) vs 24/72(33.3%)

35/72(48.6%) vs 40/72(55.6%)

0/72(0%) vs 8/72(11.1%)

Not reported

2/72 (2.8%) vs 6/72 (8.3%)

Not reported

7/72(9.7%) vs 10/72(13.9%)

VAS scale (0 =no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable) 4.3±2.2 vs 6.4 ±2.5

Not reported

Not reported

Numerical rating scale (0 = completely dissatisfied, 10= completely satisfied) 9.3±0.9 vs 6.7±1.2

1/72 (1.4%) vs 0/72 (0%)

Yang et al, 2019 [31]

14/25 (56.0%) vs 7/21 (33.3%)

11/25 (44%) vs 5/21 (23.8%)

3/25(12%) vs 5/21(23.8%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

2/25(8%) vs 1/21(4.8%)

0/25 (0.0%) vs 0/21 (0.0%)

VAS (0=no pain, 10=severe pain) 3.07±0.35 vs 6.47 ±0.51

0/25 (0.0%) vs 0/21 (0.0%)

2/25(8%) vs 2/21(9.5%)

Not reported

0/25 (0%) vs 0/21 (0%)

Dochez et al, 2020 [15]

18/74 (24.3%) vs 15/76 (19.7%)

36/74(48.6%) vs 28/76 (36.8%)

38/74 (51.4%) vs 47/76 (61.8%)

Not reported

17/74 (23.0%) vs 13/76 (17.1%)

Fetal bradycardia (P = 0.34; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.24)

Not reported

41/74 (55.4%) vs 7/76 (9.2%)

VAS scale (0 =no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable) 5.9 ± 2.4 vs 5.6 ± 2.3

Not reported

Not reported

A patient satisfaction questionnaire 87.5% vs 85.9%

Not reported

Zhang et al, 2020 [32]

28/40(70%) vs 13/40(32.5%)

Not reported

5/40(12.5%) vs 11/40(27.5%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Han et al, 2020 [33]

46/63(69.8%) vs 13/41(31.8%)

54/63(85.7%) vs 21/41(51.2%)

9/63(14.3%) vs 20/41(48.8%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

2/63 (3.1%) vs 3/41 (7.3%)

Not reported

Not reported

0/63 (0%) vs 1/41(2.4%)

2/63(3.2%) vs 2/41(4.9%)

Not reported

Not reported

Straube et al, 2021 [34]

8/23 (34.8%) vs 10/25 (40.0%)

Not reported

15/23 (65.2%) vs 17/25 (68.0%)

Not reported

0/23 (0.0%) vs 0/25 (0.0%)

0/23(0%) vs 2/25(8%)

0/23 (0.0%) vs 0/25 (0.0%)

8/23(34.8%) vs 4/25(16%)

A scale of 0–10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) 5.5 ± 2.3 vs 5.4 ± 2.7

0/23 (0.0%) vs 0/25 (0.0%)

Not reported

Using a standardized data collection sheet (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied) 4.3 ± 4.0 vs 6.9 ± 3.6

Not reported

Yang et al, 2023 [35]

44/67 (65.6%) vs 90/134 (67.2%)

Not reported

29/67 (43.3) vs 47/134 (35.1%)

Not reported

8/67 (11.9%) vs 6/134 (4.5%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

3/67 (4.5%) vs 0/134 (0%)

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Total

640/1103 (58.2%) vs 458/997 (45.9%)

403/637 (63.3%) vs 318/614 (51.8%)

298/767 (38.8%) vs 323/813 (39.7%)

1/207 (0.5%) vs 14/211 (6.6%)

37/561 (6.6%) vs 28/684 (4.1%)

24/314 (7.6%) vs 32/316 (10.1%)

16/654 (2.5%) vs 12/482 (2.5%)

59/310 (19.1%) vs 33/309 (10.7%)

-

3/384 (0.8%) vs 2/428 (0.5%)

8/388 (2.1%) vs 8/212 (3.8%)

-

23/344 (6.7%) vs 0/342 (0%)

I2(%)

59

74

82

0

0

38

0

79.3

94.1

0

0

97.2

0

RR or SMD

1.37(1.19-1.58)

1.23(1.03-1.47)

0.69(0.53-0.91)

0.16(0.04-0.74)

1.57(0.97-2.54)

0.72(0.36-1.47)

1.12(0.54-2.34)

0.96(0.30-3.02)

-1.28(-1.96 to -0.61)

1.67(0.28-9.92)

0.58(0.29-1.14)

0.98(-0.55-2.52)

8.41(2.23-31.62)

  1. ECV External cephalic version, RR Relative risk, SMD Standardized mean difference, VAS Visual analog scale, NRPS Numerical Rating Pain Scale