Skip to main content

Table 1 Organization scheme of DS questionnaire

From: Delphi survey on the most promising areas and methods to improve systematic reviews’ production and updating

Section

Type of data

Variables

Demographic data

Range, not an exact value; in order to minimize a chance to identify participants

Age, gender, years of experience in conducting SRs, number of conducted SRs, number of SRs that they have led, role/s in conducting SRs, and area of employment

Prioritisation

(1) 5-point Likert scale mandatory question regarding whether the step is time/effort/resource-intensive and should be prioritized in future research concerning methods of development and automation

Participants were offered fixed statements that a particular step needs to be prioritized in future research and an open-ended field. For each statement, participants had to rate how strongly they agree that the topic is important to include (1—“strongly disagree”, 2—“disagree”, 3—“indifferent”, 4—“agree” and 5—“strongly agree”, “I do not know”)

(2) Participants were encouraged to provide arguments for the ratings through open responses

Steps of SR production: (1) project management, (2) formulating the review question, (3) finding previous SRs, (4) writing the protocol, (5) constructing the search strategy, (6) literature searching, (7) de-duplicating, (8) screening abstracts, (9) obtaining full-text, (10) screening full-texts, (11) snowballing-citation chasing/tracking, (12) translating non-English studies into English, (13) extracting data, (14) critically appraising, (15) synthesizing data, (16) GRADE-ing (https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/)– going from evidence to decision, (17) updating the review to see whether some new studies were published between the search date and the final version of the article, (18) performing a meta-analysis, and (19) writing up the review*

Qualitative section

Open-ended long text field (non-mandatory question) in which participants were invited to freely discuss any issue they find important in that step. Participants were encouraged to provide as many opinions as they felt appropriate

(1) How the methodology of producing SRs can be improved, (2) areas that should be prioritized in future research, and (3) other issues considered important regarding SRs’ production and updating

  1. * Based on work by Tsafnat et al. [23] as well as our team’s previous work [11]